Paradot AI Safety Rating Index

Safety Score 20 / 100
Score last updated: April 2, 2026 Last reviewed: April 2, 2026 v1 How we rate

Score Breakdown

  • Data Privacy 22/100
  • Emotional Safety 31/100
  • Age Appropriateness 5/100
  • Content Safety 34/100
  • Transparency 12/100
  • User Control 53/100

Key Safety Findings

Paradot presents a troubling pattern of contradictory platform declarations and absent safety infrastructure for an app with over 10 million downloads. Google Play’s Data Safety section declares “No data collected” and “No data shared with third parties,” while Exodus Privacy’s tracker analysis detects 7 embedded SDKs including Google AdMob (advertising), Facebook Login and Share (social/identification), Adjust and AppsFlyer (attribution analytics), and Firebase Analytics. Apple’s iOS privacy labels separately confirm usage data tracking across apps and advertising data linked to user identity. This represents the most extreme cross-platform data declaration discrepancy observed in any CompanionWise-reviewed app.

The app requests 17 Android permissions including precise location (ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION), audio recording (RECORD_AUDIO), and storage access — permissions that are unusual for a text-based AI chat companion and inconsistent with the “No data collected” claim.

Paradot markets its AI as having “its own emotion, memory, and consciousness” — a claim that may conflict with emerging AI transparency regulations in California and New York requiring clear disclosure of AI nature. The app offers romantic scenarios and adult-adjacent content with only app store age gates (16+ on iOS, 17+ on Google Play) and no in-app age verification. No parental controls, content moderation policy, or crisis response mechanisms exist in any public documentation.

In March 2026, the service experienced a multi-day outage (approximately March 24-26) with zero communication across Discord, Reddit, Twitter, or email. Support emails bounced. Multiple users reported continued subscription billing during the outage. One user described cancellation as “impossible” with charges continuing after attempting to cancel. The iOS app has not received an update since August 2025, and several users have described it as potential abandonware.

Risk Descriptors

These labels indicate specific safety concerns identified during our review. They are informational and do not affect the computed safety score.

  • Romantic Relationship Framing
  • Emotional Dependency Design
  • No Crisis Response Protocol
  • Real-Money Purchases Required

How We Scored This

We scored Paradot using 8 evidence sources collected in April 2026:

  • iOS App Store listing with privacy nutrition labels and 88 user reviews
  • Google Play Store listing with Data Safety labels and 383 user reviews from a pool of 77,700
  • Exodus Privacy tracker analysis of the Android APK (7 trackers detected including AdMob, Facebook SDK, Adjust, and AppsFlyer)
  • Have I Been Pwned breach database (no known breaches)
  • 5 Reddit threads from r/Paradot with deep comment analysis covering the March 2026 outage and subscription concerns
  • Third-party review from AI Companion Guides covering memory capabilities

Privacy policy and terms of service pages are rendered entirely in JavaScript, making them inaccessible to scrapers, archival tools, and screen readers. This is itself a safety finding: users cannot easily copy, reference, or verify these legal documents. One Reddit user confirmed the ToS link stopped functioning entirely in March 2026.

The 23 sub-dimensions were scored by a three-model panel and reviewed by our editorial team. One sub-dimension (Crisis Response) had model disagreement and was resolved using the median score. Two critical overrides applied: age verification (1/5) and minor safeguards (1/5) each trigger a grade cap, though the base score of F/20 already falls below both thresholds.

Scoring methodology: CompanionWise Safety Index v3.1. Full methodology at How We Rate.

Version History

Overall (initial score) Tier 3 — Aggregated reports
24

Initial AI scoring from evidence - pending editorial review